Use the field below to perform an advanced search of The Justice archives. This will return articles, images, and multimedia relevant to your query.
Brandeis University hosted Carnegie Mellon University, Case Western Reserve University, Emory University, New York University, Washington University in St. Louis and the University of Chicago for the University Athletic Association conference indoor track and field meet.
Thanks for sending in this week's hot take, Alyssa. Draymond Green has been the starting power forward for the Golden State Warriors for the last 14 years. During this time with the Warriors he was a major contributor to four championships and the best win record in NBA history, the 2015-16 season, where the Warriors went 73-9. He is a Defensive Player of the Year and recorded the only ever triple double without points. He has revolutionized the way power forwards and centers play, often being the most ball dominant player on his team which allows his point guard, Steph Curry, to play off the ball. The archetype of a passing big, a model of player seen often in the modern NBA, is heavily influenced by Green’s playstyle and the role he plays in the Warriors offense. He is also heavily criticized for being one of the most unstable and violent players in the NBA, being sixth all time in technical fouls and second all time in flagrant fouls. I could spend all day listing distasteful things Draymond has done on the court, so I will stick to the highlights. He punched Jordan Poole in the face during a practice, leading Golden State to trade Poole and likely dashing their chances for a back-to-back championship. He stepped on Domantas Sabonis’ chest during a game, a potentially career-ending injury. He kicked Australian player Stephen Addams in his down under after getting blocked by him. He went on his podcast and called Karl Anthony-Towns “soft” for missing a game, then doubled down on his statements after learning Towns missed the game for his family friend’s funeral. I think Jusuf Nurkic got it right when asked about Draymond, he replied “That brotha needs help,” a quote that quickly went viral. It goes without saying that basketball is a very competitive sport and Draymond is not the only player to have gotten carried away during a game. Historically, he’s not even the worst player, but he’s definitely criticized the most. Dennis Rodman and the bad boy Detroit Pistons did much of the same in the ’80s and ’90s, but they receive praise for their efforts. It’s true, the game has changed since then, but that doesn’t excuse the demonization of Draymond as opposed to other players in the NBA. He himself has been outspoken about people's perception of him. Green in 2023 apologized for his behavior and agreed that changes are necessary. In 2025 he again commented saying that when people criticize his overly-physical playstyle, they are forcing him into the stereotype of “an angry black man.” While he has certainly gone too far in some instances, his contributions to NBA culture have been enormous, and he has made efforts to be better. I agree with Alyssa that Green might deserve some criticism, but the hate goes too far.
With the airing of the hit Canadian television show “Heated Rivalry” in late November and December of 2025, the series thrust actors Hudson Williams and Connor Storrie into stardom at a blinding speed. The two actors have since appeared on multiple talk shows, presented at the 2026 Golden Globes and walked runways. They have also been selected as torch bearers for the 2026 Winter Olympics, which take place in Milan, Italy, from Feb. 6 to Feb. 22.
Thank you Ben for sending in this week’s take. Tanking in sports is a pretty heavy topic. Almost every major American sport has a draft, which means that almost every American sport experiences some form of tanking. For those who are unfamiliar, tanking is when a team doesn’t believe it can achieve major success in a season and instead tries to perform worse and lose more games to receive a better chance of a higher draft pick. The NFL probably has the most egregious examples of this tactic since there isn’t a lottery in their draft. Drafts usually only give a better chance depending on win percentage whereas, in the NFL, whichever team does worst gets the first pick. It is true that equity is a hard thing to keep in professional sports, and tanking seems to be inefficient at preventing an imbalance in teams. Focusing on the NBA, the Dallas Mavericks received the number one pick despite having a winning record and a less-than-one-percent chance of getting it, the San Antonio Spurs have received a top-five pick for the last three years despite having a winning record for two of them, and the Oklahoma City Thunder are likely going to receive a top-three pick this year despite having the best win record in the league. The better question is, does tanking even work in the first place? At the end of the day, bigger market teams are always going to have more assets and it’s almost impossible for them to need to tank. Throughout the entire history of the Boston Celtics, an organization that has existed for roughly 80 years, they’ve had three losing seasons, yet they’ve still had over 30 top-ten picks. The biggest issue people have with tanking is that it makes for a terrible watching experience; personally I don’t want to watch my favorite team try to lose all of their games, and as a New York Giants fan, I haven’t. I’m going to have to disagree with Ben’s take, partially because I hate watching teams play poorly and partially because it just doesn’t work. Really bad teams tend to stay really bad and really good teams rarely lose their status and if they do it doesn’t last long.
Thank you to Maeve for sending in this week's take. For those unfamiliar with the rules in the NHL, a shootout occurs at the end of game if the score is tied and the five-minute overtime period has elapsed. Each team chooses three players to take penalty shots at a set distance from the goalie. The teams alternate shots and the team with the most shots made at the end of all attempts wins the game. If you’ve ever watched soccer it’s essentially the same as penalties. Maeve’s second point is that teams shouldn’t get points at the end of a match before overtime. The NHL’s playoff bracket uses a slightly different method than a win-loss system. Instead, they use a points system, with a win counting for two points and a loss counting for zero. If both teams make it to overtime, the loser receives one point and the winner gets two. Historically, the points system is in place since tying used to be a possible outcome for a game, but since the shootout was added into the NHL rules, a tie is no longer able to occur. Therefore, the two things Maeve has suggested to remove are already antithetical to each other, so I will try to answer which of these should stay and which has to go. My immediate impression is that the points system is erroneous since it differs from most other sports that have a regular and post season. A huge factor in both of these systems that can’t be entirely accounted for is fan enjoyment. The simple fact is that most people don’t want to watch a hockey game that lasts for over three hours, hence why shootouts exist. The argument for points being added to a team's overall total when overtime starts really boils down to an incentive to increase competition and give teams a reason to not entirely give up if they’re down points, but mounting a comeback tie is only marginally less difficult than mounting a comeback victory and teams already have an incentive to win. The points system is already outdated since ties are no longer possible, so I half agree with Maeve’s take. I think shootouts should stay, but teams getting points for making it to overtime has no real precedent for being a part of the NHL.
Inspired by quidditch, a fictional sport from “Harry Potter,” quadball boasts a complex set of rules and an opportunity to get involved with a sports team in a relatively low-stakes and fun environment.