Letter to the Editor — Arush Chandna
Universities care about their students’ mental health. Yet that care doesn’t always translate into the support students receive on campus. Limited counseling center capacity, a persistent culture of stigma, and fragmented communication around available resources leave too many students guess ing about where to turn when stress and anxiety escalate. The result is a gap between institutional intent and student experience. According to a recent survey, 27% of students said they don’t believe their educational institution offers sufficient mental health support. Chapman University’s Student Psychological Counseling Services (SPCS) provides psychotherapy and mental health resources to students, with a mission to support their psychological well-being as they pursue personal and academic goals. The department offers Zoom drop-in hours for consulta tions and questions, individual goal-directed counseling with no session limit, and refers students who need more intensive care to community providers. Chapman also offers well-being coaching through Wellness and Recreation and reduced-rate counseling at the Frances Smith Center for Individual and Family Therapy at just $15 per session. These options are impressive. But, these resources may not be adequate to solve the looming mental health crisis. Chapman University’s own SPCS page acknowledges that “SPCS experiences a high demand for services” and warns of waiting periods for non-emergency appointments. Even well-resourced counseling centers can face capacity constraints. Whether or not students know what’s available, when wait times outlast their willingness to ask for help, they may default to what’s accessible around the clock: an AI chatbot. According to a US-based think tank RAND’s study published in JAMA Net work Open, about 1 in 8 US adolescents and young adults use AI chatbots for mental health support, especially young adults from 18 to 21 years old. A working paper co-authored by Chapman University’s John Hunter, “AI for Proactive Mental Health,” tested a purpose-built app called Sunnie on nearly 500 college students and found that “AI-powered apps can proactively prevent mental health problems, rather than merely react once problems have already emerged and become acute.” Sunnie isn’t a general-purpose chatbot like Chat GPT or Gemini; it was designed by psychologists as well as students for this specific purpose. Chapman has the infrastructure to move in this direction as well. The university’s AI Hub promotes responsible AI use across campus and offers an asynchronous course teaching the basics of AI tools and their applications in higher education. Chapman’s GenAI guidelines emphasize accuracy, intellec tual property, security, privacy, and ethical considerations, and encourage faculty to set clear course-level policies on AI use. That attention to AI govern ance could extend to student wellness. A Chapman-specific mental health tool, built with clinician oversight and student input, would reach students who currently fall through the cracks between SPCS office hours and late-night conversations with ChatGPT. Chapman must also invest in AI literacy. Students need to understand why a large public language model is not equipped to provide mental health support. Hallucinated content, privacy violations, and generic responses that lack clinical grounding can do real harm when a student is in distress. Chapman should integrate these conversations into orientation programming, wellness workshops, or existing coursework so students understand the risks before bad habits form. The mental health crisis on college campuses is not new. What’s new is that students now have a 24-hour alternative to waiting for a counseling appoint ment, and that alternative was never designed to help them. Universities that treat mental health support as a checkbox rather than an evolving system will keep losing students to tools that offer availability without accountability. Chapman has the counseling foundation, the AI governance structure, and the institutional values to build something better. Arush Chandna is the co-founder of Inspira Advantage, a national medical school admissions consulting firm.

Please note All comments are eligible for publication in The Justice.