To the Editor:Investigations like "Some CAs turn a blind eye to violators" in the April 27 issue should be saved for forums where a reader expects a slanted view, not held up for everyone who expects to see actual news.

Furthermore, this article has no news qualities for two reasons. First, it is not news that students who attend your university and happen to become CAs break rules. They are college students like everyone else at Brandeis, and along with underage drinking, smoking and partying comes a certain disdain for the rules. Second, the article does not convey all sides of the issue. The writers should have provided us with the information that no CA was willing to speak on the record.

The article has holes and weaknesses that should have been detected during the editorial process. I find it hard to believe that at a major university's newspaper there are no editors who would be looking for all of these things from an article. I must commend the writers of this article for their investigation job, but I must reiterate that their job went unfinished.

By printing this unfinished article you have provided your audience with inadequate information, forcing them to lean toward one view. In doing this you have also failed as proper journalists. In closing, I suggest that you strongly consider the many messages that you send by providing one-sided articles in the form of news.

-Aviron Shemtov
Sharon, Mass.