Judge Amy Coney Barrett’s Supreme Court confirmation hearings and the balance of power
Judicial confirmation hearings are not very entertaining TV. Nominees usually pledge allegiance to the “law” while avoiding statements about what the “law” is, or even how to define it. Yet Supreme Court nominee Judge Amy Coney Barrett and her supporters claim that she is an “originalist”: they say she interprets statutes (including the Constitution) according to the evinced intent of their “drafters” — those people who wrote, amended or merely signed off on the law.
Students call for the charges of “Brandeis seven” to be dropped
Unearthing Hozier’s ‘Unheard’ gems
Context on Zionism and the war in Gaza
Brandeis Chungles reveals the creators behind the memes
Navigating Your Next Move: The Ultimate Brandeis Housing Guide