Corell opposes military strike against Iran
Hans Corell, a Swedish national and under-secretary-general for the Office of Legal Affairs and the Legal Counsel of the United Nations from 1994 to 2004, voiced his opposition—on legal grounds—to a military strike against Iranian nuclear sites in a panel discussion on social justice in the University held in the Mandel Center reading room on Monday and in a subsequent interview with the Justice. In addressing the crisis, Corell, who worked closely with the Security Council during his decade at the U.N., criticized its permanent members for contributing to international crisis and deadlock.
Corell, a member of the advisory board of Brandeis' International Center for Ethics, Justice and Public Life, said that he supports Iranian nuclear disarmament, because "a nuclear war will never be between two parties—the whole world will be affected."
However, he opposes a strike by the United States or Israel against Iranian nuclear sites because it would breach U.N. legal standards. "An attack on Iran today, in the present situation, will be a flagrant violation of the U.N. charter. The U.N. charter allows armed attacks only in two situations: in the case of clear self-defense or if there is a clear and unambiguous mandate by the U.N. Security Council," he said. "The latter [circumstance] doesn't exist, and the former, this is not the case either, because preemptive strikes are not allowed under the U.N. charter; it flies in the face of the U.N. charter." He added that the U.S. attack on Iraq in 2003, as a preemptive strike, was also "a flagrant violation of the U.N. charter."
Corell stated that efforts at Iranian disarmament must be pursued through diplomatic means. "What should be done here is that the Security Council should sit down and have a serious discussion, engaging also Iran, explaining that the Council will not accept that Iran gets involved in enriching uranium to the extent that they would develop nuclear arms," he said.
At the same time, Corell placed the burden of action on the more powerful states to reduce their quantity of nuclear weapons in order to de-escalate a nuclear crisis: "The nuclear states have to observe their obligations under the non-proliferation treaty to start disarming seriously, because the whole world needs disarmament in this field," said Corell.
The actions of the five permanent Security Council members, the U.S., United Kingdom, France, China and Russia, according to Corell, contradict their obligation to prevent war.
"It's absolutely necessary that the five permanent members sit down and have a serious discussion about how they perform their obligation under the U.N. Charter. They have a mandate by all the members to cover the primary responsibility for the maintenance of international peace and security, and yet they act in a manner that sometimes they create conflicts."
Get Top Stories Delivered Weekly
From Around the Web
More thejustice News Articles
Recent thejustice News Articles
Discuss This Article
MOST POPULAR THEJUSTICE NEWS
GET TOP STORIES DELIVERED WEEKLY
FOLLOW OUR NEWSPAPER
LATEST THEJUSTICE NEWS
- Kamensky leaves Brandeis after 20 years of teaching, Engerman steps up as...
- University's handling of sexual assault case proves unsystematic, hinderance...
- Xerox turnover yields employment controversy
- 'Twelfth Night; Or What You Will' takes an outside forum to shine
- Puppet show gets laughs in the SCC
- Culture X creates unity within diversity
- Police Log
RECENT THEJUSTICE CLASSIFIEDS
FROM AROUND THE WEB
- Have a Blast With the Family This Summer, but Stay Safe
- Chiropractic Careers Are on the Rise
- Choosing the Right Home Health Care Agency
- Pop the Champagne Diamond for Your Seasonal Fashion...
- Managing Pain: Are You Reading Your Medicine Labels?
- Does Your Garbage Want to Be Recycled?
- You Can Quit
- Pinching Penny Stocks May Be the Wise Way to Invest
- Growing Investment Opportunities In Green -- and Blue --...
- 5 Tips for Healthy Eating as We Age